[BLML] ??

Gordon Rainsford gordonr60 at gmail.com
Sat Dec 16 16:00:01 CET 2017


There’s been plenty of discussion about the new laws in various other forums.

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From: Richard Hills
Sent: 16 December 2017 06:42
To: Bridge Laws Mailing List
Subject: Re: [BLML] ??

My opinion about the lack of traffic on this mailing list nowadays is that there are not any meaningful ambiguities in the 2017 Lawbook. But in the Good Old Days the 1997 Lawbook was infested with ambiguities, thus providing fertile ground for interminable discussions.

Best wishes,

Richard Hills

Sent from my iPad

> On 16 Dec 2017, at 4:18 AM, a.witzen <a.witzen at upcmail.nl> wrote:
> 
> Nobody posts problems
> Regards anton
> 
> 
> 
> Verzonden vanaf Samsung-tablet.
> A.witzen, boniplein 86 amsterdam
> 
> 
> -------- Oorspronkelijk bericht --------
> Van: Jeff Easterson <Jeff.Easterson at gmx.de> 
> Datum: 15-12-2017 17:36 (GMT+01:00) 
> Aan: Bridge Laws Mailing List <blml at rtflb.org> 
> Onderwerp: [BLML] ?? 
> 
> I haven't received any notifications from blml for about 10 days.  Is 
> that due to my computer or you?  Ciao,  JE
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Blml mailing list
> Blml at rtflb.org
> http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
> _______________________________________________
> Blml mailing list
> Blml at rtflb.org
> http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
_______________________________________________
Blml mailing list
Blml at rtflb.org
http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rtflb.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20171216/efdec374/attachment.html 


More information about the Blml mailing list