[BLML] Could have known
ardelm at optusnet.com.au
Sat May 21 11:45:12 CEST 2016
> -----Original Message-----
> From: blml-bounces at rtflb.org [mailto:blml-bounces at rtflb.org] On
> Behalf Of Herman De Wael
> Sent: Saturday, 21 May 2016 5:46 PM
> To: Bridge Laws Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [BLML] Could have known
> Tony Musgrove schreef:
> >> Herman.
> > Thank you Herman, the reason is that in OZ, the players
> > would recognise a genuine error with no malice intended
> > and go on to the next board (in my limited experience of
> > playing with the big boys)
> Where I play, any player who finds himself down in a contract after an
> opponent misled him tries to get the contract back from the TD.
> And the Law is clear: "could have known", not "knew".
> But I understand your point. Just make it "no problem in this
> tournament" rather than "in OZ", which suggested to me that the laws
> different up there.
We are down here from up there, and the South protagonist
was actually European, while the EW were OZ extra
> > Cheers,
> > Tony (Sydney)
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Blml mailing list
> > Blml at rtflb.org
> > http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
> Blml mailing list
> Blml at rtflb.org
More information about the Blml