[BLML] tangled

Robert Park bpark56 at comcast.net
Wed Mar 23 20:17:48 CET 2016

Agreed, but I still see laws like this as impractical, unrealistic, and difficult to administer fairly and consistently. I think I’d rather see the basic principle be, “You screwed up, you suffer!” Then everyone gets treated equally over time.


> On Mar 23, 2016, at 8:08 PM, Steve Willner <swillner at nhcc.net> wrote:
> On 2016-03-23 2:44 PM, Robert Park wrote:
>> My sense, which I suspect is at least as good as your 20% example, it
>> that that number for club directors in the US is likely to be
>> vanishingly small.
> The 20% was completely made up; it could be zero to >90% for various 
> pairs I know.
> I agree with your last comment but would delete the word "club."
> As to estimating the percentage in a particular instance, it will always 
> be difficult, but a competent Director's estimate is likely to be better 
> than random or simply assuming zero.  Ideally Directors will consult on 
> any judgment ruling, of which this is surely one.  Nobody said directing 
> is easy.
> _______________________________________________
> Blml mailing list
> Blml at rtflb.org
> http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml

More information about the Blml mailing list