[BLML] The cad!
hildalirsch at gmail.com
Wed May 27 14:28:14 CEST 2015
Herman De Wael suggested:
".....the incomplete answer leads to the finding of the queen. Whoever asks
more, you play the queen on the other side....."
In my opinion, as discussed in the "Fourth suit farce" thread, players are
required to protect themselves after a trivial error by the opponents. So,
if Richard Hills was West and Hilda R. Lirsch was East, then neither of us
would "ask more".
Law 20G1 prohibits asking a question solely for partner's benefit. One
cannot dodge the application of this Law with the excuse, "I know that the
opponents have been playing EHAA for a decade, but perhaps they have just
switched to playing Nottingham Club instead." So to avoid a Law 20G1
infraction again one has to protect oneself.
Likewise, to avoid a Law 73F unnecessary and deceptive question infraction,
the solution is to avoid asking the deceptive question in the first place.
Nigel Guthrie's attractive idea of always asking a question is alas
illegal. Law 73F does not encompass a legal question cancelling an illegal
question a la positron - electron annihilation.
On Wednesday, May 27, 2015, Herman De Wael <hermandw at skynet.be> wrote:
> I have ruled this, and I have been overturned by the Belgian Appeal
> I still believe my ruling is the exact one.
> On the question: what is 5H? there is only one correct answer : 2 KC
> without the Q of trumps.
> If that answer is not given, anything the opponents do has a bridge reason.
> So the possibly misleading action must be allowed, and if one draws a
> conclusion out of it, that is to his own risk.
> After all, the incomplete answer leads to the finding of the queen.
> Whoever asks more, you play the queen on the other side, and you are
> certain to find her, or get her from the TD. That's too easy.
> Richard Hills schreef:
> > As they say in the movies, this is Based Upon A True Story.
> > All four players are Canberra experts. North-South use Keycard Blackwood
> > to reach 6S, with South declarer. As is his wont, West requests an
> > explanation of every bid in the auction. When it comes to 5H the
> > incomplete explanation "two keycards" is given. West then asks the
> > supplementary question, "Does it deny the queen of spades?"
> > Of course the answer is affirmative, and of course the success of 6S
> > depends on a two-way finesse for the queen of trumps, and of course
> > declarer finesses through East, and of course West wins the setting
> > trick with the queen.
> > Declarer casts aspersions at West, then summons the Director.
> > How would you rule?
> > Best wishes,
> > Richard Hills
> > _______________________________________________
> > Blml mailing list
> > http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
> Blml mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Blml