[BLML] FW: Ruling last saturday

Tony Musgrove ardelm at optusnet.com.au
Thu May 21 11:56:40 CEST 2015



> -----Original Message-----
> From: blml-bounces at rtflb.org [mailto:blml-bounces at rtflb.org] On Behalf
> Of Herman De Wael
> Sent: Thursday, 21 May 2015 6:48 PM
> To: Bridge Laws Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [BLML] FW: Ruling last saturday
> 
> Tony Musgrove schreef:
> > Are we so bereft of material for this list??  I had to
> > go back to Herman's original posting to see if I was
> > going mad.  See it below.
> >
> > It has already produced about 20 postings.  I would
> > ask please that all relevant information be put in
> > place in the first post.  This one has next to
> > nothing.
> >
> 
> of course not, because I wanted your opinions without telling you what
> the UI was.
> The list has got fixated on the first action, which was, IMO, totally
> OK. Let me remind you that the first action was an overcall. Quite
> reasonable one. It was the second action I was worried about. If a
> passed partner raises your overcall to game - what do you do?
> Nothing, it would seem.
> But that is one where the UI plays a part, not the first one. We're
all
> able to tell a normal overcall from another one.
> And yes, with any normal overcall one might also pass. But what does
the
> UI suggest at first?
> 
> So Tony, do not go back to the first post but to my second one for the
> relevant information.
> 
> Herman.
> 
so I overcall 1S, my passed partner bids 4S, he has 5 of them and
may be weak, so wtf would I consider bidding on?  even if I had
seen the hand records? 

Tony (Sydney)



> > Cheers,
> >
> > Tony (Sydney)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: blml-bounces at rtflb.org [mailto:blml-bounces at rtflb.org] On
Behalf
> > Of Herman De Wael
> > Sent: Monday, 18 May 2015 3:03 PM
> > To: Bridge Laws Mailing List
> > Subject: [BLML] Ruling last saturday
> >
> > Let me first poll you:
> >
> > You hold a reasonable 5332, 10 points.
> >
> > The bidding starts:
> > 			you
> > 	pass	1Di	1Sp
> > pass	4Sp	pass	?
> >
> > any thoughts?
> > _______________________________________________
> > Blml mailing list
> > Blml at rtflb.org
> > http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Blml mailing list
> > Blml at rtflb.org
> > http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Blml mailing list
> Blml at rtflb.org
> http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml



More information about the Blml mailing list