[BLML] Burn, David Burn [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

Robert Frick rfrick at rfrick.info
Wed Jan 9 17:24:17 CET 2013


On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 22:36:25 -0500, Richard HILLS  
<richard.hills at immi.gov.au> wrote:

> UNOFFICIAL
>
>> ...
>> Where is your law saying that an agreement must be initially
>> understood by both people?
>> ...
>
> Not "my" law but the 2007 Laws of Duplicate Bridge. I suggest
> RTFLB before posting heterodox questions. But for the benefit
> of newbies to blml:
>
> Law 75C says "...the mistake was in South's call. Here there
> is no infraction of Law, since East-West did receive an
> accurate description of the North-South agreement; they have
> no claim to an accurate description of the North-South hands."
>
> This clearly demonstrates (except to a heresiarch) that a North-
> South partnership agreement continues to exist even when the
> South player has temporarily forgotten her agreement.






>
> Also, Law 40A1(a) says "the players", NOT "one player".
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Richard Hills
>
> UNOFFICIAL
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please  
> advise
> the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately.  This  
> email,
> including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally  
> privileged
> and/or copyright information.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination
> or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the
> intended recipient is prohibited.  DIAC respects your privacy and has
> obligations under the Privacy Act 1988.  The official departmental  
> privacy
> policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au.   
> See:
> http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privacy.htm
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>


-- 
Wisdom is the beginning of seeing.


More information about the Blml mailing list