[BLML] Controversial case (repost) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

Richard HILLS richard.hills at immi.gov.au
Tue Aug 20 00:04:07 CEST 2013


Jeff Easterson:

>>>NS unknown but apparently fairly weak.


>>>it was simply a guess (and probably not a very good one) that happened
>>>to be successful.

Henk Uijterwaal:

>>I don't quite see the problem here.  South was clueless but guessed right.

Grattan Endicott, May 2004:

>+=+ An interesting thought. I have not seen, as far as I recall, a regulation in
>any competition that actually says "It is forbidden to play inferior bridge".

David Stevenson, May 2004:

Well, it is time there was one, and it was explained to my partners and team-


Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately.  This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally privileged
and/or copyright information.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination
or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.  DIAC respects your privacy and has
obligations under the Privacy Act 1988.  The official departmental privacy
policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au.  See:


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rtflb.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20130819/99d30a32/attachment.html 

More information about the Blml mailing list