[BLML] Pointless TD calls for 2017
gordonrainsford at btinternet.com
Sun Jun 24 11:54:41 CEST 2012
I read this after my reply just now. Perhaps you're just arguing over
who calls the director, rather than whether the director should be
called. In which case, argue all you like.
On 21/06/2012 22:49, Marvin French wrote:
> Please read
> L16B2 carefully and you will find that its excellent guidance does not
> provide for a TD call by the other side in case of UI unless the RA option
> has been adopted (as it was formerly by the ACBL, but not this time).
> Rather, it permits (but does not requre) the other side to comment on the
> UI. The pompous "I reserve the right to summon the Director later" is better
> expressed as "Can we agree there was a break in tempo?" If the UI side
> disagrees, it is *they* who should call the TD.
More information about the Blml