[BLML] Unfair? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

richard.hills at immi.gov.au richard.hills at immi.gov.au
Mon Apr 30 01:41:40 CEST 2012


Nigel Guthrie:

[snip]
>For example, in a non-Bridge context, would
>you accept the argument that to save work
>for policemen and to ensure a level playing
>field for criminals, the law should ban witness-
>reports and discourage police-patrols :)

Bridge is not the real world of Syrian secret
police-patrols. Bridge is much more important
than that, a game for ladies and gentlemen.

Best wishes,

Richard Hills

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately.  This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally privileged
and/or copyright information.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination
or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.  DIAC respects your privacy and has
obligations under the Privacy Act 1988.  The official departmental privacy
policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au.  See:
http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privacy.htm


---------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rtflb.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20120429/98f47987/attachment.html 


More information about the Blml mailing list