[BLML] Penalty card
l.kalbarczyk at gmail.com
Tue Apr 10 00:09:20 CEST 2012
W dniu 2012-04-09 16:36, Nigel Guthrie pisze:
> Partner’s penalty card, that is unauthorised information to you. Does
> this mean ...
> The suit and rank of the card is UI? OR
> The fact that he has a penalty card is also UI?
> Could this make a difference to secretary-birds?
> Especially in jurisdictions that allow you to vary agreements after an
I've found it :
The knowledge that a penalty card has to be played at the first legal
opportunity is admissible information
for both sides and has a remarkable consequence. Declarer is playing 4♥.
If LHO holds ♠KQJ5,
RHO has ♠A as a penalty card (first lead from the wrong side) and
declarer does not forbid a spade
lead, LHO is allowed to play ♠5 - but he is not allowed to use the
information that his partner seems to
have ♠Ax. If this results in an extra trick for the defending side, the
TD should use his discretionary
powers, as described in Law 12A1, to adjust the score.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Blml