[BLML] OLOOT is back in hand

Robert Frick rfrick at rfrick.info
Sat Apr 7 22:43:02 CEST 2012


On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 16:30:25 -0400, Ed Reppert <blackshoe at mac.com> wrote:

>
> On Apr 7, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Robert Frick wrote:
>
>> Ah. My partner leads the queen of spades face up OLOOT. I am asked not  
>> to
>> lead a spade and the queen now goes back in his hand. I was thinking  
>> that
>> my knowledge of the queen of spades is UI. I am actually very surprised
>> that you claim differently.
>>
>> Right, if the knowledge of the queen of spades is AI, the whole problem
>> disappears. I agree with you completely on that. I can now understand  
>> your
>> disgust at my position.
>
> Perhaps it would help to actually read TFLB. Law 50E discusses the UI  
> implications of a penalty card.


I think Jeff needs to read that part. I knew it.

Byt the way, according to L54, the OLOOT does not become a penalty card  
until the first two options are rejected.


More information about the Blml mailing list