[BLML] Beating the Count [SEC=UNOFFICIAL

Robert Frick rfrick at rfrick.info
Wed Sep 29 04:26:40 CEST 2010

On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:46:47 -0400, <gampas at aol.com> wrote:

> <Richard Hills>
> I believe that the current Law 16A1(d) is practical.  I believe that
> the mooted hypothetical new Law 16A1(d) would be highly impractical.
> <Paul Lamford> I am persuaded. And what would be equally impractical
> would be for a TD to decide the Law is wrong because they do not agree
> with it.

The current law does allow the pro to look at his hand and then remind the  
client of any conventions the pro chooses. The client then picks

That's a law you are going to strictly follow? (You wrote: "Duplicate  
bridge tournaments should be played in strict accordance with
the Laws.") It's "impractical" if some director doesn't allow that because  
he thinks it is wrong?

More information about the Blml mailing list