[BLML] For the love of Benji [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
blml at arcor.de
Tue Nov 9 18:36:45 CET 2010
Alain Gottcheiner <agot at ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> Le 9/11/2010 5:40, richard.hills at immi.gov.au a écrit :
> > Imps
> > Dlr: North
> > Vul: North-South
> > The Aussie Acol bidding went:
> > WEST NORTH EAST SOUTH
> > Dorothy Jesner Richard Hills
> > --- 1S Pass 1NT
> > Pass Pass Pass
> > Dummy
> > KQT42
> > K
> > AT6
> > QJ94
> > Declarer
> > A7
> > 7653
> > 9873
> > AT8
> > Dorothy led the nine of spades to dummy's deuce, my five and
> > declarer's ace. At that point declarer asked me about the
> > systemic meaning of the nine of spades. I replied that Dorothy
> > was promising the ten of spades but denying any higher honour.
> > So at this point all four players know that Dorothy's opening
> > lead was a false card.
> > At trick two declarer led the seven of spades, and the trey
> > appeared from Dorothy. Declarer now had to decide whether
> > Dorothy's opening lead was a falsecard from:
> > (a) 9863 (systemic opening lead eight of spades), or
> > (b) 973 (systemic opening lead seven of spades), or
> > (c) J983 (systemic opening lead trey of spades).
> What about 9x ? Is there any reason to imagine anything else ?
Makes me wonder what Richard leads from
a SINGLETON 9 against NT.
I am inclined to rule MI ;-).
More information about the Blml