[BLML] inferior and irrational

Thomas Dehn blml at arcor.de
Sat Nov 6 13:56:50 CET 2010

Herman De Wael <Hermandw at skynet.be> wrote:
> It would help a lot if we were to be able to agree on the following 
> statement.
> A line which is inferior to another line, to such a degree that the 
> claimer cannot fail to conclude that inferiority, shall be considered 
> irrational.
> Can we agree on this?

I disagree. You would need an even more restricted
type of inferiour.
You would need a line that under no reasonable
layout makes more tricks than the other line.

Consider xxxxx opposite AQJTx. Playing for the drop
is inferior, but not irrational. 


More information about the Blml mailing list