[BLML] a new sort of claim

Alain Gottcheiner agot at ulb.ac.be
Fri May 21 11:23:36 CEST 2010


Grattan a écrit :
> Grattan Endicott<grandaeval at tiscali.co.uk
> ********************************
> Skype directory:  grattan.endicott
> ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
> " Incremental change will not do. It is time
> for a wholesale, big bang approach"
>               ~ The Rt. Hon. Nick Clegg MP
> "''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Alain Gottcheiner" <agot at ulb.ac.be>
> To: "Bridge Laws Mailing List" <blml at rtflb.org>
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 12:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [BLML] a new sort of claim
>
>
> ton a écrit :
>   
>> ton:
>> If you don't know how to rule, may be. But my approach towards
>> dummy in this case doesn't make it probable that he will do it twice.
>>
>>     
> AG : well, that's not sure. Yesterday evening, I mentioned that dummy
> was high -it was- and I'll do so later. But the important part is :
> everybody at the table considered this as a claim.
> <
> +=+ What the players 'considered' is immaterial.
>   
AG : nobody ever thought that dummy didn't claim ; that should at least 
be a hint that "dummy is not allowed to claim; therefore he didn't" is 
dubious.



More information about the Blml mailing list