[BLML] Convention Disruption

Marvin French mfrench1 at san.rr.com
Fri Jan 29 05:28:54 CET 2010

ACBL General Conditions of Contest for pair games, August 2009:

A partnership is responsible for knowing when their methods apply in 
probable (to be expected) auctions. A pair may be entitled to 
redress if their opponents did not originally have a clear 
understanding of when and how to use a convention that was employed.

Looks like something Bobby Wolff would write. Is this a reasonable 
"condition"? Easily enforced?

Marvin L French
San Diego, CA

More information about the Blml mailing list