[BLML] Pear(-shape) of Davids Burn [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
bpark56 at comcast.net
Fri Jan 29 00:34:19 CET 2010
On 1/28/10 5:51 PM, Grattan wrote
>> +=+ The foregoing conversazione staggers about in areas that
>> are treated in the WBF Code of Practice under "Psychic calls"
>> and "Disclosure of psychic tendencies". It would be sensible to
>> look at what the CoP says. For example, "Players who are
>> found to have any explicit agreement concerning psychic calls,
>> or an implicit agreement concerning a particular kind of psychic
>> call, are to be reminded that they have a partnership agreement
>> that is subject to the regulations established under the authority of
>> Law 40. In particular see Law 40C1." Again, the CoP states
>> "Opponents are entitled to an equal and timely awareness of any
>> agreement, explicit or implicit, since it may affect their choice of
>> action and for this reason the understanding must be disclosed."
>> Having absorbed that much we should go back to the sub-
>> paragraphs (a) through (d) under 'Psychic calls'. Revelations on
>> blml can be adjudged to create a mutual awareness of the kind
>> to which (d) refers; if any of us were to sit down with Herman
>> as partner we could not deny a mutual awareness in respect of
>> what he has described here. More widely the Director would
>> be required to consider the level of bruit - the degree to which
>> awareness of Herman's assertions, on blml and wherever, has
>> circulated abroad.
>> ~ Grattan ~ +=+
So...are you saying that once I become aware that my partner has psyched
a particular bid...say, twice in 2 years...that he may no longer psych
that bid, and therefore that I don't need to alert what I have observed
of his tendency?
My apologies, but I sometimes have difficulty discerning exactly what it
is you are trying to say. Perhaps I am a slow learner. The sense I am
getting is that you (and Richard) are part of the movement to ban psychs.
More information about the Blml