[BLML] San Diego Lightfoot Sue [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
dpb3 at fastmail.fm
Thu Jan 7 15:15:31 CET 2010
> Jeff Polisner was of the opinion that members (i.e. country federations)
> of the WBF are required to follow the WBF version of the Laws, but that
> organizations like the ACBL which is not a member may differ.
ACBL is a zonal member of WBF, and Polisner cannot be seriously saying
that USBF is the actual NO for bridge in the USA. Where is he coming
> Gary Blaiss agreed with Polisner. The ACBL Laws Commission is responsible
> for the set of Laws used by the ACBL. He also noted that in the past
> there was cooperation between essentially the ACBL and WBF to agree on a
> uniform set of Laws. This set of laws does not follow that paradigm, and
> Blaiss would like to see a return to the previous situation of
> cooperation between the ACBL and WBF to draft the Laws of Duplicate
The November 2007 ACBLLC minutes say,
"The Commission decided to accept the change in title and, in fact, *in
order to ensure that the ACBL version of the Laws is the same as the WBF
verwion*, accepts as the ACBL version the drfat approved by the WBF"
What has happened to bring about the change in attitude indicated by the
and -- if having seven ACBL'ers on the fifteen-member WBFLC isn't enough
to ensure WBF/ACBL cooperation in law-making, what "return to [a]
previous situation" is envisioned?
More information about the Blml