[BLML] 12A1 case or not?
agot at ulb.ac.be
Tue Dec 22 17:21:30 CET 2009
Konrad Ciborowski a écrit :
> Here is a case from the final of the Grand Prix Of Poland cycle.
> The level of the field is about as high as you get in this country,
> 16 top pairs who vied for qualification all year.
> The players involved in this incident are experts, First
> Division level though none of them has ever played on the
> national team.
> Matchpoints. Future declarer opens 14-16 1NT with a nice 16 count.
> Everyone passes and partner tables an 8 count. Few pairs play
> 1NT 14-16 in Poland so it looks that everyone else is in 3NT;
> dummy will invite game opposite 15-17 and opener
> will probably accept.
> The 3NT contract hinges on the diamond suit where you
> have 9 cards withouth the queen.
> In the middle of the play it dawns on declarer that the previous
> hand might have been miscored. He stands up to talk to
> his partner about the score of the previous board (screens
> are used so it is easier to speak when you stand) then
> sits down and the play of the current hand resumes. Declarer
> gets the diamonds right by finessing on the second round
> of the suit.
> The opponents object that declarer could have seen his screenmate's
> hand when he suddenly and unexpectadly stood up.
And ... do they mean dummy had made some signs after seeing their hands,
"spotscars" style ?
Because I don't see what else could be problematic with being able to
see dummy's hands.
If this is the case, it's a more serious offense than just L12.
If not, what's the heck ?
BTW, it looks like, if everybody was in 3NT, declarer's score doesn't
depend from his handling of diamonds.
If you correct 150 to 120, few matchpoints will change hands.
More information about the Blml