[BLML] What if I lied? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

Alain Gottcheiner agot at ulb.ac.be
Fri Dec 18 11:19:52 CET 2009


Grattan a écrit :
> Grattan Endicott<grandaeval at tiscali.co.uk
> ********************************
> "We'll have a board of directors and we'll
> have board meetings - and we'll do what
> I want."         ~  Barry Hearn.
> "''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Herman De Wael" <Hermandw at skynet.be>
> To: "Bridge Laws Mailing List" <blml at rtflb.org>
> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 9:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [BLML] What if I lied? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
>
>
>   
>>> Note that the Drafting Committee carefully excluded the
>>> word "ch**t*ng" from any appearance in the 2007 Lawbook.
>>>
>>>       
>> I see that Richard agrees with me!
>> It had to happen sometime!
>>
>>     
> +=+ I am not getting them point. Is this a word ever used in
> the laws? Is it suggested it might have been? Where are these
> exchanges going?                    ~ G ~   +=+ 
>
>   
AG : surely it might have been.
The wording of L73 (old & new), for example, makes it obvious that one 
was very careful to avoid printing that word where it would have been 
fit but un-PC.


More information about the Blml mailing list