[BLML] Canberra Claim [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

richard.hills at immi.gov.au richard.hills at immi.gov.au
Wed Aug 5 04:12:25 CEST 2009

For the first time in a couple of years, I was invited to serve on
a Canberra Bridge Club appeals committee.

State Open Teams Qualifying, Match 6, Board 22, Dlr: East, Vul: EW

K6532                                        7
KQ74                                         A53
K6                                           A42
A6                                           T97532

West declared 4H in the Moysian fit; a good decision by East-West
since the alternative 3NT contract is down one on best defence.

Details of the play are unavailable, but this was the four-card
ending (declarer having previously won 8 tricks and lost 1 trick)
with the lead in declarer's hand:

65                                           ---
7                                            ---
---                                          4
6                                            T97

At this point declarer claimed, with the Law 68C statement,
"Conceding a club".

If this claim had occurred in a European Championship a decade
ago, as Chief Director Antonio Riccardi how could (not would)
you have ruled?

If this claim had occurred in a European Championship a decade
ago, as Appeals Committee member Grattan Endicott how could (not
would) you have ruled?

That is, is a split score of -620 NS / -100 EW ever conceivably
legal under Law 70A's "as equitably as possible to both sides"???

Best wishes

R.J.B. Hills, Aqua 5, workstation W550
Telephone: 02 6223 8453
Email: richard.hills at immi.gov.au
Recruitment Section & DIAC Social Club movie tickets

Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately.  This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally privileged
and/or copyright information.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination
or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.  DIAC respects your privacy and has
obligations under the Privacy Act 1988.  The official departmental privacy
policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au.  See:


More information about the Blml mailing list